Skip to main content
· 9/19/2011

Stanard v. Nygren

Citations

  • 658 F.3d 792
  • 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1082
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19213
  • 2011 WL 4346715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court need not allow the filing of an amended complaint “where the amendment would be futile”
  • holding that dismissal with prejudice is “eminently reasonable” where party is afforded multiple opportunities to replead and fails to follow explicit instructions on how to correct inadequacies in earlier pleading
  • explaining that Rule 8 requires that defendants be given fair notice of the claims against them
  • noting that a complaint may violate Rule 8 where “discerning the basic legal and factual basis of the claims is not impossible but merely unnecessarily difficult”
  • noting that Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 requires a complaint to give the defendant notice of the plaintiff’s claims and the grounds upon which those claims rest
  • stating that “unintelligibility is certainly a legitimate reason for” rejecting a complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.