Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 9/1/1999

Owens v. State

Citations

13 S.W.3d 742
1999 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 907
1999 WL 1569793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting interpretation of a statute that was “contrary to the statute’s text”
“deficient representation by omission requires more than a speculative showing of a lost potential benefit”
“For purposes of proving an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, proof of deficient representation by omission requires more than a speculative showing of lost potential benefit.”
“[f]or purposes of proving an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, proof of deficient representation by omission requires more than a speculative showing of a lost potential benefit”
“For purposes of proving an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, proof of deficient representation by omission requires more than a speculative showing of a lost potential benefit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge David G. Hayes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.