Skip to main content

People v. Julien

Citations

  • 47 P.3d 1194
  • 2002 WL 1271619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering federal precedent and that of states with judicial ethics rules similar to Colorado’s in construing the provisions of a parallel Colorado rule
  • judge's prior association with the office of the district attorney who was prosecuting the case did not disqualify judge from hearing the case
  • judge's prior association with the office of the district attorney who was prosecuting the case did not disqualify judge from hearing the case
  • trial judge must disqualify himself or herself if judge had supervisory role over attorneys prosecuting the case
  • knowledge of governmental attorneys is not imputed to other attorneys in that office
  • “A judge must also consider the Code of Judicial Conduct sua sponte or in response to a disqualification motion in determining whether to serve on the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobbs, Bender, Martinez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Julien

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.