State v. Schiefelbein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate review of hearsay issues is de novo with no presumption of correctness
• holding that appellate review of hearsay issues is de novo with no presumption of correctness
• holding that appellate review of hearsay issues is de novo with no presumption of correctness
• holding that “a party is bound by the ground asserted when the party objected at trial”
• noting that the language of Rule 16 is straightforward, the State’s duty is mandatory, and “the state shall permit ” inspection and copying
• rejecting argument that the defendant’s right to a public trial was violated when the court screened the media and the public from seeing videotapes of a child victim; no closure occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).