Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 37 So. 3d 243
  • 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 287
  • 2010 Fla. LEXIS 803
  • 2010 WL 2104125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Stewart’s substantive challenge to the jury instructions is procedurally barred because it could have been raised on direct appeal.”
  • “[T]rial counsel’s reliance on his retained experts is not proven unreasonable simply because another expert, in this case Dr. Eisenstein, questions the thoroughness of the prior evaluations.”
  • “[T]rial counsel’s reliance on his retained experts is not proven unreasonable simply because another expert, in this case Dr. Eisenstein, questions the thoroughness of the prior evaluations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente, Lewis, Canady, Polston, Labarga, Perry, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.