O'TOOLE v. Northrop Grumman Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court “abused its discretion by failing to take judicial notice of [investment fund’s earnings history] provided by [the defendant] on the internet[.]”
• reflecting that the defendant’s policy “provide[d] for gross-up on consequential damages in that it was ... policy to make reloca-tions financially neutral to employees”
• noting that courts may take “judicial notice of factual information found on the world wide web”
• noting that courts may take “judicial notice of factual information found on the world wide web”
• discussing Federal Rules of Evidence 201(b)’s standards for judicial notice and stating ”[i]t is not uncommon for courts to take judicial notice of factual information found on the world wide web
• taking judicial notice of information on Northrop Grumman’s website and noting “[i]t is not uncommon for courts to take judicial notice of factual information found on the world wide web”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).