Patricia Hennessy v. Penril Datacomm Networks, Incorporated and Richard Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly refused to take judicial notice of a corporation’s Form 10-K to determine a fact in dispute
• holding that the district court properly refused to take judicial notice of a corporation’s Form 10-K to determine a fact in dispute
• stating that “[i]n order for a fact to be judicially noticed, indisputability is a prerequisite.”
• “[N]othing in the plain language of § 1981a conditions an award of punitive damages on an underlying award of compensatory damages.”
• “In order for a fact to be judicially noticed, indisputability is a prerequisite.”
• judicial notice of SEC filings may be appropriate when the fact in question is undisputed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).