Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 7/10/2001

Lozano v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 258 F.3d 1160
  • 57 Fed. R. Serv. 477
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3633
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15535
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,989
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 564
  • 2001 WL 776769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the presumption applies “[w]hen t]ie receipt date for an EEOC right-to-suq letter is unknown or disputed”
  • noting that the Tenth Circuit has “implicitly sanctioned applying either a five-day or a three-day [mailing time] presumption”
  • explaining that the presumption applies “[w]hen the receipt date for an EEOC right-to-sue letter is unknown or disputed”
  • noting that the Tenth Circuit has “implicitly sanctioned applying either a five-day or a three-day [mailing time] presumption”
  • approving a five-day presumption of receipt after a right-to-sue letter’s mailing “whenever the actual receipt date is unknown or disputed”
  • approving a presumption of receipt either three or five days after mailing “whenever the actual receipt date is unknown or disputed,” id. at 1165

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McKay, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lozano v. Ashcroft

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.