Skip to main content
D. Oregon· 9/3/2015

Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.

Citations

  • 129 F. Supp. 3d 1012
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118188
  • 2015 WL 5178073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the “monopoly leveraging claim fails for the same reasons as Plaintiff’s other antitrust claims fail—Plaintiff fails to allege anticompetitive conduct”
  • “The Supreme Court has established that a claim for monopoly leveraging ‘presupposes anticompetitive conduct.’ That is, there must be some other conduct that is actionable for Plaintiff’s claim to be cognizable.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.