· 9/7/2011
Hollinger v. Home State Mutual Insurance
Citations
- 654 F.3d 564
- 2011 WL 3890833
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the same standards apply' to ■ CAFA exception cases regardless of whether the exceptions are raised on a motion to remand or a motion to dismiss
- taking judicial notice of census data to determine applicability of “local controversy” and “home state” exceptions to CAFA jurisdiction
- “Evidence of a person’s place of residence ... is prima facie proof of his domicile.”
- “Evidence of a person’s place of residence, however, is prima 24 facie proof of his domicile.”
- “Evidence of a person’s place of residence . . . is prima facie proof of his domicile.” (citation omitted)
- “Evidence of a person’s place of residence . . . is prima facie proof of his domicile.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reavley, Garza, Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.