Skip to main content

Osborne v. State

Citations

  • 662 S.E.2d 792
  • 291 Ga. App. 711
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1873
  • 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that forensic interviewer could properly testify that child's \singsong manner of responding\ to interviewer's questions was not consistent with child being coached
  • holding that forensic interviewer could properly testify that child’s “singsong manner of responding” to interviewer’s questions was not consistent with child being coached
  • affirming admission of expert testimony that child’s manner of responding during interview not consistent with being coached
  • trial court properly admitted expert testimony that \the child's manner of responding during the interview showed signs of spontaneity and detail that were not consistent with being coached\
  • expert’s testimony that victim’s manner of responding in interview showed signs of spontaneity and detail inconsistent with coaching was not improper
  • trial court properly admitted expert testimony that “the child’s manner of responding during the interview showed signs of spontaneity and detail that were not consistent with being coached”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Ruffin, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.