Skip to main content

Burris v. State

Citations

  • 420 S.E.2d 582
  • 204 Ga. App. 806
  • 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 403
  • 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court's exclusion of certain evidence was reversible error, explaining that if the evidence was enough to raise a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt in the mind of a juror, it was adequate to change the outcome of the case
  • finding that the trial court’s exclusion of certain evidence was reversible error, explaining that if the evidence was enough to raise a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt in the mind of a juror, it was adequate to change the outcome of the case
  • exclusion of evidence that victim had accused another man of molesting her during the same time period defendant was charged with molesting her constituted reversible error
  • trial court properly excluded evidence of an unrelated molestation by a third party when the victim never named the third party as her molester and there was no evidence supporting the defendant’s position that the victim was molested or abused by the third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Carley, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.