Algren v. the State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “offenses have not been joined solely because they are of the same or similar character when the evidence of one offense can be admitted as similar transaction evidence during the trial of the other offense and severance is not mandatory in such a case”
• “[W]hen the evidence of one offense can be admitted as similar-transaction evidence during the trial of the other offense, the decision of whether to sever the offenses for trial is within the discretion of the trial court.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).