Skip to main content

Ledford v. State

Citations

  • 313 Ga. App. 389
  • 721 S.E.2d 585
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3947
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 1081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding admission of evidence of similar transaction committed when defendant was 11 or 12 years old
  • “Any ‘bolstering’ can be explored by defendant in cross-examination.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • Judge Adams’ dissent observed that “it may be presumed that a child of 13 years or older is accountable for his actions” in a case in which the majority concluded that similar transaction committed when defendant was 11 years old could be admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.