Stillwell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial counsel’s failure to object to admissibility of victim’s videotaped interview did not prejudice defendant because video was cumulative of other evidence
• holding that evidence that the appellant had ejaculated on the victim’s face was sufficient to support a child molestation conviction
• lawyer’s statement that he did not see any evidence that child had 20 been coached did not impermissibly address the ultimate issue before the jury or bolster the child’s credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).