Skip to main content
· 11/8/2006

Roth v. Cohen

Citations

  • 941 So. 2d 496
  • 2006 WL 3208502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an issue “must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved”
  • finding a sufficient nexus between defamation claims and a design contract, thereby bringing the claims into the purview of the contract’s arbitration clause
  • “For an issue to be preserved for appeal, . . . it ‘must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Rothenberg, and Lagoa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.