Cassedy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parties had waived their right to have a court decide attorney’s fees because both parties had made claims for attorney’s fees in arbitration and the arbitral panel had granted an award of attorneys’ fees
• concluding parties expressly waived right to have issue of attorney fees decided by a court instead of arbitrators by requesting attorney fees in arbitration pleadings and closing argument
• holding parties waived the right to insist that a court decide attorney’s fees issue because (1) both parties agreed to submit to arbitration all the claims raised in the statement of claim, which included a claim for attorney’s fees, (2
• finding a joint submission of attorneys’ fees to NASD arbitrators when “both parties agreed to submit to arbitration all the claims raised in the statement of claim, which included the claim for attorney’s fees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).