Skip to main content
· 1/4/2010

Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

Citations

  • 592 F.3d 1119
  • 49 Communications Reg. (P&F) 141
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 79
  • 2010 WL 6745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the agreements to arbitrate under the FAA can be invalidated under general contract defenses such as fraud, duress, or unconscionability
  • noting that all “data may be considered to the extent they indicate how the Florida Supreme Court might rule on an issue”
  • “In instances where a state’s highest court has not ruled on a point of state law, federal courts are bound by decisions of a state’s intermediate appellate courts unless there is persuasive evidence that the highest state court would rule otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Hull, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.