· 1/4/2010
Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
Citations
- 592 F.3d 1119
- 49 Communications Reg. (P&F) 141
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 79
- 2010 WL 6745
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the agreements to arbitrate under the FAA can be invalidated under general contract defenses such as fraud, duress, or unconscionability
- noting that all “data may be considered to the extent they indicate how the Florida Supreme Court might rule on an issue”
- “In instances where a state’s highest court has not ruled on a point of state law, federal courts are bound by decisions of a state’s intermediate appellate courts unless there is persuasive evidence that the highest state court would rule otherwise.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carnes, Hull, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.