Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/6/2014

Organogenesis Inc. v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 41 F. Supp. 3d 14
  • 2014 WL 1783608
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f Apligraf qualifies as a SCOD, this Court may hear the case under the ultra vires doctrine of review,” but “if Apligraf does not qualify as a SCOD, 42 U.S.C. § 1395l (t)(12)(A) precludes this Court’s review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Organogenesis Inc. v. Sebelius

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.