Curran v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff's claims of alleged government surveillance and harassment as part of a \national security investigation\ were fanciful and insufficient
• explaining that federal courts are “without power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are ‘so attenuated and unsubstantiated as to be absolutely devoid of merit’”
• finding that the plaintiff’s “laundry list of wrongful acts and conclusory allegations to support h[is] theory of a conspiracy,” were patently “insufficient to allow the case to go forward.”
• finding that the plaintiff’s “laundry list of wrongful acts and conclusory allegations to support h[is] theory of a conspiracy,” were patently “insufficient to allow the case to go forward.”
• dismissing plaintiff’s complaint because his “claims relating to alleged government surveillance and harassment are the type of ‘bizarre conspiracy theory’ that warrant dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1
• finding plaintiff’s allegations of government surveillance and harassment to be “the type of bizarre conspiracy theory that warrant[s] dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1)” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).