Jacqueline A. Tommas Griffith v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court \was without jurisdiction to review\ plaintiff's claims because government acted within its statutory authority
• concluding that district court “was without jurisdiction to review” plaintiff’s claims because government acted within its statutory authority
• concluding that the requirements of procedural due process do not apply to the denial of a WIGI because there is no 14 constitutional property interest in a WIGI
• explaining that, in Ral-pho, we concluded the statute did not preclude constitutional claims because there was “no affirmative statement addressed to preclusion” in the legislative history
• “finding in the legislative history no affirmative statement addressed to preclusion of constitutional claims, we held there was no preclusion of such claims” in Ralpho (emphasis in Griffith )
• finding no Kyne jurisdiction where, at most, the defendant may have “failed to capture some marginal nuance of the Back Pay Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).