Texas Alliance For Home Care v. Kathleen Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where \awarding of contracts\ was protected from judicial review, the financial standards regulation that determined eligibility for contracts was also protected
• holding that where “awarding of contracts” was protected from judicial review, the financial standards regulation that determined eligibility for contracts was also protected
• declining to conduct ultra vires review where “plaintiffs’ allegations of ultra vires action” were “conclusory” and based on unsupported inferences
• describing plaintiffs’ claim under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) as an argument that certain agency action “should be set aside under the APA as ultra vires”
• dismissing APA claim in light of similar preclusion statute because the “APA does not apply … to the extent that … statutes preclude judicial review” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• dismissing APA claim in light of similar preclusion statute because the \APA does not apply ... to the extent that ... statutes preclude judicial review\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).