Skip to main content

O'HARA v. State

Citations

  • 642 So. 2d 592
  • 1994 WL 457142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under the facts in this case, the trial court abused its discretion in limiting voir dire questioning to less than two minutes per prospective juror.”
  • limitation prevented counsel from asking questions concerning the theory of defense, as well as basic questions
  • “A trial court abuses its discretion when the imposition of unreasonable time limitations or limitations on the number of questions results in the loss of this fundamental right.”
  • “A trial court abuses its discretion when the imposition of unreasonable time limitations or limitations on the number of questions results in the loss of this fundamental right.”
  • abuse of discretion to limit voir dire of 24 jurors to 40 minutes
  • abuse of discretion to limit voir dire of 24 jurors to 40 minutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.