Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 424 So. 2d 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant deserved a new trial where the trial judge prevented defense counsel from \asking pertinent questions not covered by the State or the court by a very short time limit imposed without apparent warning\
  • stating that a trial court “has considerable discretion in determining the extent of counsel’s examination of prospective jurors”
  • twenty-minute voir dire of jury for one defendant after short voir dire by court held reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.