Skip to main content

Watson v. State

Citations

  • 693 So. 2d 69
  • 1997 WL 199090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to extend voir dire because “the proffered questions were either of minimal significance, covered by the general jury instructions, or covered during the state’s voir dire examination”
  • affirming time limit of thirty minutes per side for voir dire when counsel was told of this limitation prior to the start of questioning
  • “The appropriateness of the time limitation imposed by a trial court must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whatley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.