Skip to main content

State v. Saunders

Citations

  • 339 So. 2d 641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a resisting-with- violence conviction does not establish the validity of the underlying arrest
  • holding that words alone cannot constitute disorderly conduct less they are “fighting words” or “words like shouts of ‘fire’ in a crowded theatre”
  • limiting disorderly conduct statute, when applied purely to speech, to fighting words and false words that create a clear and present danger to others
  • limiting the application of § 877.03 so that it would only apply to “fighting words” or “words like shouts of ‘fire’ in a crowded theatre” to avoid First Amendment concerns
  • falsely reporting some physical hazard in circumstances where such a report creates a clear and present danger of bodily harm to others, such as yelling \fire\ in a crowded theater
  • Section 877.03 also encompasses words like shouting “fire” in a crowded theatre

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hatchett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.