District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/18/1990
Pineda v. State
Citations
- 571 So. 2d 105
- 1990 WL 205872
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting reversal because the time limitation “prevented Pineda's counsel from adequately following up in an area of inquiry which proved important in light of the charges and the theory of defense”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barkdull, Hubbart and Ferguson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- O'HARA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-24· cited 18×
- Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-29· cited 17×
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-25· cited 11×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-09· cited 7×
- Ferrer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-04· cited 7×
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-25· cited 7×
- Leamon v. PunalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-07· cited 3×
- Francis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-07· cited 3×
- James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-12· cited 2×
- Zitnick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-09· cited 2×
- Cohn v. JulienDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-19· cited 1×
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-14· cited 1×
- Helton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09
- Byron Davonne McMath v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-05-07
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.