Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/9/1980
McClain v. State
Citations
- 419 A.2d 369
- 288 Md. 456
- 1980 Md. LEXIS 211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the per se rule of Johnson to suppress a statement made 24 hours and 12 minutes after arrest
- applying the exclusionary rule of Johnson v. State retroac tively
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-14· cited 337×
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-22· cited 91×
- Facon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 50×
- Polakoff v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-11· cited 49×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-04· cited 47×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 39×
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-05-31· cited 31×
- Hiligh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 15×
- Odum v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-07· cited 15×
- United Wire, Metal & MacHine Health & Welfare Fund v. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-28· cited 14×
- Enviro-Gro Technologies v. BockelmannCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-05· cited 14×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-03· cited 13×
- State v. GormanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-27· cited 13×
- Prokopis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-02· cited 12×
- Calhoun v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-07· cited 11×
- Matusky v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-28· cited 10×
- Suggs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-08-27· cited 8×
- State v. MinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-03· cited 7×
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 2,030×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 1,364×
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 1,282×
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,237×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 855×
- Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 764×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.