Skip to main content

Richardson v. State

Citations

  • 694 So. 2d 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a revocation of probation based on a violation not alleged in the charging document is fundamental error
  • holding that \[t]he revocation of a defendant's probation based on a violation not alleged in the charging document is a deprivation of the right to due process of law\ and, as such, amounts to fundamental error
  • holding revocation of defendant's probation based on violation not alleged in charging document is a deprivation of right to due process of law
  • revoking probation based on violation not alleged in charging document is denial of due process which can be raised for the first time on appeal
  • \The revocation of a defendant's probation based on a violation not alleged in the charging document is a deprivation of the right to due process of law.\
  • “[R]evocation of a defendant’s probation based on a violation not alleged in the charging document is a deprivation of the right to due process of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.