Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 738 So. 2d 433
  • 1999 WL 496595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding revocation of probation on grounds never alleged in writing violates due process and is fundamental error
  • reversing the revocation of probation because it was based upon a condition not properly pled or proven
  • \Revocation of probation on grounds never alleged in writing violates due process and is fundamental error.\
  • \Revocation of probation on grounds never alleged in writing violates due process and is fundamental error.\
  • “Revocation of probation on grounds never alleged in writing violates due process and is fundamental error.”
  • \Revocation of probation on grounds never alleged in writing violates due process and is fundamental error.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.