O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Tobacco II's actual reliance requirement applies equally to the unlawful prong of the UCL when the predicate unlawfulness is misrepresentation and deception” (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “While Gravquick makes clear one such circumstance is where the legislation contains an explicit limitation, there is no logical reason to reach a different result where that limitation is implicit . . . .”
• in a case where plaintiff alleged a business practice likely to deceive members of the public (as opposed to himself), stating that \third-party reliance is insufficient to establish [plaintiff's] standing under the fraud prong of the UCL\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alterg, Inc. v. Boost Treadmills LLC
  N.D. California· 2019-05-20· cited 36×
• Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2014-09-17· cited 33×
• 23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com. DNA, LLC
  N.D. California· 2018-08-23· cited 15×
• Letizia v. Facebook Inc.
  N.D. California· 2017-07-14· cited 9×
• Rosen v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2016-02-23· cited 6×
• Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2015-06-12· cited 4×
• I.B. ex rel. Bohannon v. Facebook, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2015-03-10· cited 2×
• Ward v. CareFusion Solutions, LLC
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2018-03-13
• O'Grady v. Merchant Exchange Productions, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-10-31
• In re Volkswagen \Clean Diesel\ Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.
  N.D. California· 2018-09-07

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Michael Lacey v. Joseph Arpaio
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 4,653×
• Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
  Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 2,910×
• United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-26· cited 2,266×
• Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-03-24· cited 1,380×
• Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 1,211×
• Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 1,134×
• Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
• Cousins v. Lockyer
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-15· cited 714×
• Fleming v. Pickard
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-09-09· cited 420×
• Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw
  California Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 236×
• Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1999-01-04· cited 235×
• Stephan Pardi v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-11-15· cited 227×
• Reeves v. Hanlon
  California Supreme Court· 2004-08-12· cited 154×
• Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 131×
• Morgan v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-09-23· cited 125×
• Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of Orange
  California Supreme Court· 2011-11-21· cited 116×
• Silva v. Providence Hospital of Oakland
  California Supreme Court· 1939-12-28· cited 107×
• Westside Center Associates v. Safeway Stores 23, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-02-05· cited 101×