Skip to main content
· 8/12/2004

Reeves v. Hanlon

Citations

  • 95 P.3d 513
  • 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 289
  • 33 Cal. 4th 1140
  • 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7367
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1244
  • 2004 Daily Journal DAR 9911
  • 2004 Cal. LEXIS 7239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that corporations may have nominal officers without control over business
  • concluding corporate officers who 1 participate in management of the corporation are fiduciaries of the corporation
  • holding “a plaintiff may recover damages for intentional interference with an at-will employment relation under the same California standard applicable to claims for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage”
  • stating a wrongful act is an act “proscribed by some constitutional, statutory, regulatory, common law, or other determinable legal standard”
  • applying the same “independently wrongful act” standard to intentional interference with an at-will contract as to intentional interference with prospective economic advantage
  • stating “a defendant is not subject to liability for intentional interference if the interference consists merely of extending a job offer that induces an employee to terminate his or her at-will employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.