Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a complaint failed to satisfy Rule 9(b) 11 where the allegations were lacking in detail
• holding a 24 complaint violates Rule 8 if a defendant would have difficulty understanding and responding to 25 the complaint
• explaining the pleading standard 13 under Iqbal applies to Rule 12(c) motions, because Rule 12(b) and Rule 12(c) motions are functionally 14 equivalent
• applying Iqbal to Rule 12(c) motions because Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c) motions are functionally equivalent
• discussing this concept in the context of a False Claims Act retaliation claim
• applying the Iqbal standard 25 of review to Rule 12(c) motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).