Skip to main content
· 10/30/2003

Norton v. Spencer

Citations

  • 351 F.3d 1
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22336
  • 2003 WL 22459121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If it is a close question whether the state decision is in error, then the state decision cannot be an unreasonable application.” (quoting McCambridge v. Hall, 303 F.3d 24, 36 (1st Cir. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.