Birch v. Polaris Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties can forfeit or waive \their right to argue for de novo review\
• stating that movants lack good cause if they \knew of the underlying conduct but simply failed to raise [their] claims\ (alteration in original
• noting that a party seeking leave to amend must show both good 12 cause under Rule 16(b) and lack of prejudice under Rule 15(a)
• explaining that a party seeking leave to amend after a scheduling order deadline must satisfy both Rule 16(b) and Rule 15(a)
• concluding there is “no need to consider whether Appellants satisfied Rule 15” when they did “[]not establish ‘good cause’ under Rule 16”
• noting that, where the plaintiffs failed to establish good cause, there was no need to consider Rule 15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).