First Circuit· 3/6/2003

Kenneth Conley v. United States

Citations

323 F.3d 7
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4018
2003 WL 834541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

distinguishing Calderon on the grounds that “[t]he considerations are somewhat different where ... we are concerned with intra-federal proceedings,” 7 but nevertheless denying the motion to recall the mandate
explaining the Government’s evidence at trial was “always circumstantial because no one testified that he or she saw [Petitioner] looking at Cox in pursuit of Brown and [Petitioner] never admitted seeing him.”
explaining the Government’s evidence at trial was “always circumstantial because no one testified that he or she saw [Petitioner] looking at Cox in pursuit of Brown and [Petitioner] never admitted seeing him.”
citing, inter alia, Metabolife Int’l, Inc. v. Wornick, 264 F.3d 832, 846 (9th 23 Cir. 2001) (noting “the Supreme Court has restated [Rule 56(d
distinguishing precedent limiting restrictions on post conviction review where only “intra-federal proceedings” are involved
distinguishing precedent limiting restrictions on post conviction review where only \intra-federal proceedings\ are involved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Bownes, Howard, Lipez, Lynch, Selya, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.