Skip to main content

State v. Love

Citations

  • 711 P.2d 1240
  • 147 Ariz. 567
  • 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Coleman in part; agreeing with White that retail value is at least substantial evidence of value, and that the price tags should be admitted on this basis
  • the testimony of a security employee who “had no involvement in merchandising, selling, or pricing items at the store” held inadmissible to prove value
  • “The constitutionally protected right to be present at all critical stages of trial . . . may be waived if the defendant voluntarily absents himself at trial.”
  • defendant’s failure to maintain contact waives right to be present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kleinschmidt, Eubank, Gerber, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.