Skip to main content
· 12/27/2005

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of Justice

Citations

  • 432 F.3d 366
  • 369 U.S. App. D.C. 49
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28730
  • 2005 WL 3526676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “segregability is not required” for document protected by work-product immunity because, unlike a privilege, work-product immunity protects the facts themselves, so the document is immune in its entirety
  • “factual material is itself privileged when it appears within documents that are attorney work product”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Edwards, Williams, Circúit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.