Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/31/1958

Nishikawa v. Dulles

Citations

  • 356 U.S. 129
  • 78 S. Ct. 612
  • 2 L. Ed. 2d 659
  • 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party’s burden of proof is not satisfied by discrediting the opposing party’s witnesses; affirmative evidence is required
  • requiring a clear and convincing standard of proof for voluntary expatriation in the absence of congressional guidance and in the light of analogous Supreme Court precedents
  • requiring a clear and convincing standard of proof for voluntary expatriation in the absence of congressional guidance and in the light of analogous Supreme Court precedents
  • discussing the government’s burden of responding once a showing of conscription had been made
  • determining the district judge’s disbelief of the plaintiffs testimony that he was drafted in a foreign army, was by itself insufficient to satisfy the government’s burden of proving the plaintiff had voluntarily joined a foreign army and thus should lose his United States citizenship
  • in the absence of evidence of congressional intent to adopt a particular standard of proof, Court imposes clear-and-convincing-evidence standard in expatriation cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Black, Frankfurter, Harlan, Douglas, Burton, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Nishikawa v. Dulles

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.