Skip to main content
· 12/6/1915

MacKenzie v. Hare

Citations

  • 239 U.S. 299
  • 36 S. Ct. 106
  • 60 L. Ed. 297
  • 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1462

Syllabus

<p>In construing a statute, whatever was said or given prominence in debate gives way to its actual language as passed; all reasons that induced its enactment and all of its purposes must be supposed to be satisfied and expressed by its words as finally enacted.</p> <p>Under the Constitution every person born in the United States is a citizen thereof.</p> <p>The provisions in § 3 of the Citizenship Act of March 2, 1907, that any American woman who marries a foreigner takes the nationality of her husband, is not limited as to place or effect prior to the termination of the marital relation.</p> <p>Where an act of Congress is explicit and circumstantial, as is § 3 of the Citizenship Act of 1907, it would transcend judicial power to insert limitations or conditions upon disputable considerations.</p> <p>Whatever may have been the law of England and the original law of this country as to perpetual allegiance of persons to the land of their birth, Congress by the act of 1868, now Rev. Stat. 1999, explicitly declared the right of expatriation to have been the law.</p> <p>The identity of husband and wife is an ancient principle of our jurisdiction, and is still regained notwithstanding much relaxation thereof; and while it has purpose, if not necessity, in domestic policy, it has greater purpose, and possibly' greater necessity, in international policy.</p> <p>As a Government, the United States is invested with all the attributes of sovereignty and has the character and powers of nationality, especially those concerning relations and intercourse with foreign powers.</p> <p>Citizenship is of tangible worth, but the possessor thereof may voluntarily renounce it even though Congress may not be able to arbitrarily impose such renunciation.</p> <p>Marriage of an American woman with a foreigner may involve national complications of like kind as physical expatriation may involve and is therefore within the control of Congress.</p> <p>Marriage of an American woman with a foreigner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]ll the reasons that induced [a statute’s] enactment and all of its purposes must be supposed to be satisfied and expressed by its words .... ”
  • “In 1868 Congress explicitly declared the right of expatriation to have been and to be the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKenna, McReynolbs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.