Supreme Court· 6/12/1944
Baumgartner v. United States
Citations
- 322 U.S. 665
- 64 S. Ct. 1240
- 88 L. Ed. 1525
- 1944 U.S. LEXIS 1209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the trial court burden of proof “would be lost” without heightened appellate review
- describing the burden on the government in denaturalization cases as proof by “clear, unequivocal, and convincing” evidence
- noting the “so-called ultimate ‘facts’” under review “clearly implie[d] the application of standards of law”
- ultimate fact which involves appraisal of strength of entire body of evidence is independently reviewable under correction of error standard
- ultimate fact which involves appraisal of strength of entire body of evidence is independently reviewable under correction of error standard
- “One of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize . . . and that means not only informed and responsible criticism but the freedom to speak foolishly and without moderation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black, Douglas, Frankfurter, Murphy, Rutledge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
270 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 2,465×
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,770×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-11-08· cited 1,331×
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 1,144×
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 1,005×
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 951×
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 927×
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 913×
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 789×
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-01-20· cited 634×
- Niemotko v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 563×
- Pennekamp v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 529×
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 518×
- Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-05-12· cited 444×
- Kerry v. DinSupreme Court· 2015-06-15· cited 275×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-10-11· cited 695×
- Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1913-10-20· cited 258×
- Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 252×
- United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court· 1917-04-09· cited 229×
- United States v. NessSupreme Court· 1917-12-10· cited 122×
- Northern Bank of Toledo v. Porter Township TrusteesSupreme Court· 1884-03-03· cited 69×
- Beyer v. LeFevreSupreme Court· 1902-05-19· cited 55×
- United States v. BaumgartnerW.D. Missouri· 1942-11-11· cited 15×
- Baumgartner v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1943-09-11· cited 13×
Other cases named Baumgartner v. United States
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.