Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/16/1956

United States v. Minker

Citations

  • 350 U.S. 179
  • 76 S. Ct. 281
  • 100 L. Ed. 2d 185
  • 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In short, [“witnesses”] is patently ambiguous: it can fairly be applied to anyone who gives testimony in a proceeding, although the proceeding immediately or potentially involves him as a party, or it may be restricted to the person who gives testi- mony in another’s case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frankfurter, Black, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Minker

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.