Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental Retardation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “clear and convincing” standard of proof, which protects 7 “important public interest[s],” requires a plaintiff to prove her allegations “to a high probability”
• noting the appropriateness of a higher standard of proof only in “equity-type cases” of fraud
• noting the appropriateness of a higher standard of proof only in \equity-type cases\ of fraud
• noting only the appropriateness of using the higher standard in “equity-type cases” of fraud
• noting only the appropriateness of using the higher standard in \equity-type cases\ of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).