Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/28/2019

Nieves v. Bartlett

Citations

  • 587 U.S. 391
  • 139 S. Ct. 1715
  • 204 L. Ed. 2d 1
  • 2019 U.S. LEXIS 3557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliation claim unless plaintiff presents “objective evidence that he was arrested when otherwise similarly situated individuals not engaged in the same sort of protected speech had not been.”
  • “The plaintiff pressing a retaliatory arrest claim must plead and prove the absence of probable cause for the arrest.”
  • suit against municipality, law enforcement officers and lab technician who fabricated evidence for alleged misconduct in the investigation and prosecution of case
  • first two quoting Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 259, 20 260, 126 S.Ct. 1695 (2006)
  • Equal Protection Clause not violated by California property tax system in which assessed value could increase only two per cent a year except in cases of improvements or change of ownership
  • no First Amendment retaliation claim where officer had reasonable suspicion for plaintiff’s detention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.