District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/20/2000
Reinish v. Clark
Citations
- 765 So. 2d 197
- 2000 WL 991017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even a non-Florida resident can claim a homestead exemption where the property is the permanent residence of another legally or naturally dependent on the non-resident
- \[Slecondary residences do not trigger the same public policy concerns and are not entitled to the same protection as permanent ... residences.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. RoachSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-14· cited 103×
- Advisory Opin. to Atty. Gen. Re Tax Exemp.Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-15· cited 22×
- Hagan v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-13· cited 18×
- Stanek v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-12-05· cited 14×
- Apthorp v. DetznerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-23· cited 11×
- Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-28· cited 9×
- Wells v. HaldeosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-22· cited 6×
- Bruner v. HartsfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-17· cited 5×
- State, Dept. of Highway Safety v. SarnoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-29· cited 4×
- Marco Island Cable, Inc. v. Comcast Cablevision of the South, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2007-03-08· cited 3×
- In re WileyN.D. Florida· 2016-06-03· cited 2×
- In Re CookN.D. Florida· 2011-12-07· cited 1×
- Deluccio v. HavillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-17· cited 1×
- In re MiddletonN.D. Florida· 2011-11-22· cited 1×
- Deluccio v. HavillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-13
- Directv, Inc., etc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-10
- AgoFlorida Attorney General Reports· 2005-11-09
- WILLIAM DAVID FITTS v. BILL FURST, PROPERTY APPRAISERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-09-13
- TERRY P. HEDDEN, JR. v. Z OLDCO, LLC, f/k/a ZTS.COM, LLC, ZENO TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC., F/K/A HEDDEN ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-30
Cites
79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 4,065×
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 3,439×
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court· 1970-03-02· cited 2,056×
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,863×
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,649×
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 1,449×
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 1,109×
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court· 1937-05-24· cited 904×
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 899×
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 882×
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1869-11-18· cited 857×
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court· 1973-03-26· cited 851×
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court· 1994-04-04· cited 799×
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 795×
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 760×
- Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1986-06-23· cited 702×
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 685×
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 671×
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 621×
Other cases named Reinish v. Clark
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.