District of Columbia· 6/12/2002
New York v. Microsoft Corp.
Citations
- 209 F. Supp. 2d 132
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10765
- 2002 WL 1311437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to dismiss Takings Clause action where equitable relief was sought until conducting “a substantive evaluation of the competing remedy proposals”
- noting that “[w]hile certainly a state alleging injury must establish that its own citizens have suffered some injury, none of the cases cited by Microsoft hold that parens patriae standing should be denied where the injury is felt by the citizens of the other states”
- “‘[M]illions of citizens of, and hundreds, if not thousands, of enterprises in each of the United States . . . utilize[d] PCs running on Microsoft software.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kollar-Kotelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-10-05· cited 194×
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-11· cited 31×
- Fontaine v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District of Columbia· 2014-05-16· cited 29×
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-11-15· cited 15×
- Hanson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2009-05-07· cited 13×
- Pro-Football, Inc. v. HarjoDistrict of Columbia· 2008-06-25· cited 10×
- Blasko v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2007-08-08· cited 8×
- Breen v. TuckerDistrict of Columbia· 2011-11-04· cited 7×
- The QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA v. Blue Tee Corp.N.D. Oklahoma· 2009-09-02· cited 7×
- Shays v. United States Federal Election CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2007-09-12· cited 6×
- Woodyard v. HarperDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-18· cited 6×
- In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.S.D. California· 2018-09-05· cited 5×
- Colbert v. United States Attorney's OfficeDistrict of Columbia· 2011-06-27· cited 1×
- Sim Development, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-02
- State of Maryland v. United States Department of EducationDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-17
- Metropolitan Municipality of Lima v. Rutas De Lima S.A.C.District of Columbia· 2024-03-12
- Avila v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia· 2024-11-01
- E.M. v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center P.C.District of Columbia· 2025-03-28
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 2,844×
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court· 1996-05-28· cited 2,781×
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 2,587×
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 2,323×
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 2,256×
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,155×
Other cases named New York v. Microsoft Corp.
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District of Columbia· 2002-11-01· cited 19×
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District of Columbia· 2003-09-22· cited 16×
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District of Columbia· 2002-02-24· cited 7×
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District of Columbia· 2002-11-01· cited 5×
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District of Columbia· 2008-01-29· cited 3×
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District of Columbia· 2002-05-29
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2000-06-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.