New York v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the proper objective of the remedy in this case is termination of the exclusionary acts and practices related thereto which served to illegally maintain [Microsoft’s] monopoly.”
• acknowledging “unquestionable legal authority which indicates that the Court may address conduct beyond the 60 precise parameters of that found to violate the antitrust laws”
• “When issues have been resolved at a prior stage in the litigation, based upon principles of judicial economy, courts generally decline to revisit resolved issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).