New York v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the proper objective of the remedy in this case is termination of the exclusionary acts and practices related thereto which served to illegally maintain [Microsoft’s] monopoly.”
• acknowledging “unquestionable legal authority which indicates that the Court may address conduct beyond the 60 precise parameters of that found to violate the antitrust laws”
• “When issues have been resolved at a prior stage in the litigation, based upon principles of judicial economy, courts generally decline to revisit resolved issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2016-06-27· cited 187×
• Massachusetts v. Microsoft Corp.
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-06-30· cited 129×
• Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.
  District of Columbia· 2014-09-25· cited 24×
• Freeland v. AT & T Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-08-17· cited 24×
• Comes v. Microsoft Corp.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2006-01-27· cited 20×
• United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2011-08-29· cited 8×
• In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation
  D. Maryland· 2003-05-09· cited 6×
• New York v. Microsoft Corp.
  District of Columbia· 2008-01-29· cited 3×
• In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation
  D. Maryland· 2002-12-31· cited 2×
• United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. Straus
  S.D. New York· 1999-12-10· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-06-30· cited 1×
• Joe Comes And Riley Paint, Inc., An Iowa Corporation, Vs. Microsoft Corporation, A Washington Corporation
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2006-01-27
• United States v. Philip Morris USA
  District of Columbia· 2019-12-20
• Federal Trade Commission v. Surescripts, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2023-03-30
• Federal Trade Commission v. Surescripts, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2023-04-24
• United States of America v. Google LLC
  District of Columbia· 2025-09-02