Shays v. United States Federal Election Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing plaintiff’s filing of three separate motions for 1 noting resulting confusing array of factual statements, denial, and counter-statements, but 2 nevertheless considering all three motions under the court’s discretion
• WRTL II analysis is inapplicable to analysis of corporate contribution limits
• WRTL II analysis is inapplicable to analysis of corporate contribution limits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).