New York v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although pretrial depositions are generally “conducted in private as a matter of modern practice,” the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nevertheless “places the onus upon the party seeking to exclude others from pretrial discovery” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Felling v. Knight
  S.D. Indiana· 2003-01-08· cited 17×
• SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Synthon Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  M.D. North Carolina· 2002-09-05· cited 15×
• In re Baycol Products Litigation
  D. Minnesota· 2003-04-17· cited 10×
• Partner Investments, LP v. Theranos, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2018-04-23

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 1,798×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1994-05-02· cited 609×
• Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1988-09-28· cited 251×
• In Re \Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation
  Second Circuit· 1987-06-10· cited 185×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-07-17· cited 172×
• In Re the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
  D.C. Circuit· 1985-09-20· cited 148×
• Avirgan v. Hull
  District of Columbia· 1987-12-09· cited 64×
• Doe v. Chicago Police Officer
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-08-07· cited 7×
• United States v. Poindexter
  District of Columbia· 1990-02-22· cited 5×
• Northern States Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric, Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 1994-05-27· cited 5×
• United States v. Poindexter
  District of Columbia· 1990-02-15· cited 4×
• In Re Texaco Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1988-03-11· cited 3×