Skip to main content
· 5/20/2004

New. Net, Inc. v. Lavasoft

Citations

  • 356 F. Supp. 2d 1090
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27434
  • 2004 WL 3185298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that one purpose of California's 60-day deadline for anti-SLAPP motions was to dismiss lawsuits early in litigation
  • finding free software intended to 11 inform users of secretly downloaded programs comparable to “a magazine whose focus is the 12 evaluation of consumer goods,” so that flagging of plaintiff’s surreptitious software related to sale 13 of domain names was not commercial speech
  • “Defendant properly directs its anti-SLAPP motion only to the pendant state law 8 claims set out in the Complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.